WebJul 25, 2016 · Brief of respondent Gillespie County, Texas in opposition filed. Nov 13 2007: Reply of petitioner Walter A. Rothgery filed. (Distributed) Nov 14 2007: DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 30, 2007. Dec 3 2007: Petition GRANTED. Dec 19 2007: Record received from U.S.C.A. for the 5th Circuit. WebAug 1, 2008 · See Rothgery v. Gillespie County, ___ U.S. ___, 128 S.Ct. 2578, 171 L.Ed.2d 366 (2008), rev'g 491 F.3d 293 (5th Cir. 2007). The Court decided what it termed a "threshold issue" in the case, holding that "a criminal defendant's initial appearance before a judicial officer, where he learns the charge against him and his liberty is subject to ...
NACDL - Right to Counsel / FIRST PRINCIPLES: Constitutional …
WebJun 25, 2008 · The Sixth Amendment right to counsel attaches at a criminal defendant's initial appearance before a magistrate judge, where he learns the charge against him and … WebFeb 2, 2006 · The next morning, July 16, 2002, Rothgery appeared before Judge Carl Schoessow, Justice of the Peace, Precinct #2, Gillespie County. At that time, Judge … auスマートパスプレミアム wi-fi
Rothgery v. Gillespie County - SCOTUSblog
WebMar 17, 2008 · On July 15, 2002, Walter Allen Rothgery was arrested without warrant and appeared before a local magistrate as required by Texas law. Following his release on … WebOn July 15, 2004, Rothgery sued defendant-appellee Gillespie County under 42 [491 F.3d 296] 296 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that the county violated his Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment right to counsel by following a policy of denying appointed counsel to arrestees released from jail on bond and by failing to adequately train and monitor those involved in … WebSee United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus ROTHGERY v. GILLESPIE COUNTY, TEXAS CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 07–440. Argued March 17, 2008—Decided June 23, 2008 Texas police relied on erroneous information that … au スマートパスプレミアムとは