WebThe court in stated that not only did the record of the bail proceedings form part of the subsequent trial record, but any evidence which the accused elected to give at the bail hearing was admissible against him or her at the trial, provided that the court which heard the bail application had warned the accused of the risk of making such … WebFeb 7, 2013 · Schedule. The South African Constitutional Court in the case of S. v. Dlamini; S. v. Dladla and others; S. v. Joubert; S.v. Schietekat 1999 (2) SACR 51; 1999 (4) 623 (CC) dealt with the issue of “exceptional circumstances” in bail applications. The issue before the Constitutional Court was whether or not section 60 (11) (a) of the Act ...
Dlamini v S (AR208/2024) [2024] ZAKZPHC 17 (24 February 2024)
http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZACC/1999/8.html http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZASCA/1992/173.html territory sales representative cox
Bail Judgment-Exceptional Circumstances-STRUCTURING OF …
Webimportant Constitutional Court judgement in S v Dlamini, S v Dladla and Others; S v Joubert; S v Schietekat, which pronounced on the constitutionality of some of the bail provisions contained in section 60 of the CPA.4 This textual review of bail in South Africa’s criminal procedure was an important one in outlining the legal WebThe cases are the following: Dlamini was convicted of murder and robbery in the Natal High Court in spite of his constitutional objection to the use by the prosecution of a statement he made when applying for bail. On appeal to this court he challenged the trial court’s rejection of his objection. WebIn S v Naidoo 1996 (2) SACR 250 (W) “the possibility of success on appeal” was held to be sufficient to consider bail. EVALUATION [20] It is important to note that the cases of S v De Abreu, S v Williams, S v Anderson, S v Hudson and S v Naidoo (supra) were all decided before the amendments to Act 51 of territory sales rep jobs